Save the dateLab Data Summit 2027April 8 · PhiladelphiaRequest your invitation

Case study · AI patient finding · Clinical trials

Connect a known genotype
with the clinical picture.

A rare disease biotech needed to see which identified mutation carriers showed signs of symptomatic progression—and which physicians were treating them.

From genotype to clinical context

Known genetic finding

Start with identified mutation carriers.

Longitudinal clinical signals

Evaluate patterns of active disease progression.

Treating specialist

Connect the patient finding with a provider.

ClientMid-sized gene therapy biotech
IndicationRare genetic cardiomyopathy
Use caseClinical trial patient finding
~98%Of identified patients mapped to their treating physician

A targeted list
to support site outreach.

Connected genetic findings, longitudinal clinical signals, and provider attribution helped the sponsor move toward a site-ready recruitment list.

The challenge

The genetic finding
was only the starting point.

Genetic testing had already identified mutation carriers. The sponsor needed to distinguish carriers with signs of symptomatic disease, the trial’s eligibility trigger, and understand which physicians were treating them.

The required clinical context sat across genetic results, longitudinal lab data, and claims history.

The approach

How Prognos AI solved it

The workflow linked the known genetic finding with clinical signals over time, then added treating-provider attribution.

Link.

Privacy-preserving tokens connect each mutation carrier’s genetic result with longitudinal claims and lab history.

Detect.

AI phenotyping reviews lab and claims signals over time to flag carriers showing active disease progression.

Route.

Provider attribution maps identified patients to treating specialists, supporting site outreach and recruitment planning.

The reported outcome

Clinical context connected
to the treating physician.

Approximately 98% of identified patients mapped to their treating physician in the reported example.

The resulting targeted recruitment list gave the sponsor patient and provider connections for site outreach.

A genetic result becomes more useful for recruitment planning when it can be evaluated alongside the patient’s clinical history and treating-provider context.

Treating-physician mapping

Of patients identified through the described workflow

Reported mapping rate~98%

Where else this approach may apply

When the genotype is known
before the clinical trigger.

The source identifies these as potential applications of the approach, rather than additional reported client outcomes.

ENPP1 deficiencyDuchenneLate-onset Pompe

What the case illustrates

Connect the signal
with the next useful step.

This example combines a known genotype with the clinical and provider context needed to support recruitment planning.

Evaluate clinical progression.

Use longitudinal signals to move beyond mutation-carrier status when the program requires evidence of symptomatic disease.

Connect to the physician.

Add treating-provider attribution so the identified population can support a targeted site-outreach workflow.

Explore patient finding

Bring your clinical criteria.
Find the relevant context.

Talk with Prognos about your indication, available genetic findings, and the clinical signals your program needs.

What could your genetic
data reveal next?

Explore how connected lab, claims, and provider context could support your patient-finding program.

Talk with Prognos
Cookie Preferences