Prostate cancer (PC) remains a significant men's health concern, demanding innovative treatment strategies and precise commercialization approaches. While claims data offers a cost-effective starting point for understanding patient journeys and treatment patterns, it often lacks the granular detail needed to optimize the commercial success of new therapies. Strategic integration of lab data becomes invaluable in bridging this gap.
Claims data, readily available and relatively inexpensive, provides a broad overview of patient demographics, diagnoses (ICD-9: 185 / ICD-10: C61, Z19.1, Z19.2, R97.21), and treatment encounters. It can reveal prescribing patterns for common therapies like ADT (Lupron, Zoladex), first-generation anti-androgens (Casodex), and newer agents like second-generation anti-androgens (Xtandi, Zytiga, Erleada). Researchers can use claims to track chemotherapy (Taxotere, Jevtana) and radiopharmaceutical (Xofigo) use in mCRPC, understand market share, identify key prescribers, and analyze treatment sequences.
However, claims data has limitations. It often lacks critical information about disease progression and patient response. For example, while claims data can indicate a GnRH agonist prescription, it doesn't reveal the patient's PSA level—a crucial biomarker for monitoring disease activity and treatment efficacy. Similarly, a PC diagnosis might be present, but the Gleason score—a key factor in risk stratification and treatment decisions—is rarely included. This gap in clinical detail hinders understanding a therapy's true impact on specific patient subgroups.
Lab data, conversely, provides a wealth of actionable insights. PSA levels, Gleason scores, and other critical biomarkers (e.g., genetic mutations like BRCA1/2, ATM, dMMR) offer a nuanced view of the patient's disease state. This data empowers:
The current PC treatment landscape is rapidly evolving. While traditional hormonal therapies and chemotherapy remain important, the emergence of second-generation anti-androgens, immunotherapies (Provenge), radiopharmaceuticals, and targeted therapies based on genetic mutations is transforming the paradigm. Understanding the complex interplay between these therapies and patient characteristics requires detailed lab data. The increasing role of genetic testing in PC management further emphasizes integrating lab data into commercialization strategies. As more targeted therapies become available, identifying patients with specific genetic mutations will be critical for ensuring the right patients receive the right treatment at the right time.
Beyond understanding patient populations, lab data is instrumental in identifying and profiling healthcare providers (HCPs) actively involved in treating patients with recurrent and/or resistant PC. This information is invaluable for commercial teams optimizing sales and marketing efforts. Lab data facilitates:
Example: A company launching a new targeted therapy for patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) and a specific genetic mutation can leverage lab data to:
By leveraging lab data to identify and profile key HCPs, commercial teams significantly improve the efficiency and effectiveness of their outreach, ultimately leading to greater market success.
In conclusion, while claims data offers a valuable starting point for understanding the PC market, lab data is essential for unlocking the true potential of new therapies. By integrating lab data into commercialization strategies, companies gain a deeper understanding of patient needs, optimize treatment approaches, and ultimately improve outcomes for men living with prostate cancer.
Looking to add lab data to your commercial targeting efforts for prostate cancer? Connect with a Prognos Health clinical team member to learn more today.